[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrwCzQJvbpbue4T=HWLmbq5sZOP3RXwiupKvXe71uboUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:30:56 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@...alys.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
"tgih.jun@...sung.com" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
h80.chung@...sung.com, Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Enable boot partition access from DT
On 2 September 2014 17:49, Jean-Michel Hautbois
<jean-michel.hautbois@...alys.com> wrote:
> This property is useful when we don't want to access boot partitions on eMMC
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@...alys.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 +
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
> index 431716e..59cc854 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Optional properties:
> - mmc-hs200-1_2v: eMMC HS200 mode(1.2V I/O) is supported
> - mmc-hs400-1_8v: eMMC HS400 mode(1.8V I/O) is supported
> - mmc-hs400-1_2v: eMMC HS400 mode(1.2V I/O) is supported
> +- no-boot-part : when preset, tells to access boot partitions
>
> *NOTE* on CD and WP polarity. To use common for all SD/MMC host controllers line
> polarity properties, we have to fix the meaning of the "normal" and "inverted"
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index ccec0e3..439e663 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -942,6 +942,11 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,delay-line", &boarddata->delay_line))
> boarddata->delay_line = 0;
>
> + if (of_find_property(np, "no-boot-part", NULL))
> + boarddata->access_boot_part = false;
> + else
> + boarddata->access_boot_part = true;
> +
> return 0;
> }
> #else
> @@ -1119,6 +1124,9 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V;
> }
>
> + if (!boarddata->access_boot_part)
> + host->mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_BOOTPART_NOACC;
> +
Hmm, I don't think MMC_CAP2_BOOTPART_NOACC should have a DT binding.
Does it describe the hardware in some form?
Actually I would like to question why MMC_CAP2_BOOTPART_NOACC exists
at all. If there are cards that don't supports the BOOT area,
shouldn't we have a card quirk for it instead of a host cap? Maybe
Adrian Hunter, how originally wrote the patch for adding
MMC_CAP2_BOOTPART_NOACC, could help me understand the reasons behind
it!?
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists