linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:46:09 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>
Cc:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
	luca.abeni@...tn.it, rdunlap@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	raistlin@...ux.it, juri.lelli@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and
 improvements


* Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:00:25AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > 
> > This is version 3 of a small patchset that fixes and improves SCHED_DEADLINE
> > documentation.
> > 
> > Patch 1/4 fixes and clarifies terminology; patch 2/4 aligns Section 4 to
> > the current interface; patch 3/4 improves and clarifies what admission
> > control means on UP an SMP systems; patch 4/4 introduces an appendix about
> > testing.
> 
> For patch 1 & 2, please consider adding a Reviewed-by from me 
> (there's some nitpick, but nothing serious).
> 
> For patch 3 & 4 I have some comments, but again, nothing 
> severe. I'd like a short feedback before adding a reviewed-by 
> though.

I had these queued up, but I'll wait for the next round of 
patches before applying them.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/