lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:44:12 +0100 From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net" <kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>, "patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>, "linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, "kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>, Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/19] irqchip: gic: Provide support for interrupt grouping On 02/09/14 22:36, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 2 Sep 2014, at 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >>> index 4b959e6..423707c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >>> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ >>> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h> >>> >>> #include <asm/cputype.h> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ >>> +#include <asm/fiq.h> >>> +#endif >> >> Is there much advantage to this ifdef over providing a dummy asm/fiq.h >> in ARM64? > > While it’s unlikely we’ll use FIQs on arm64 (they are generally > reserved for the secure world/firmware), I don’t mind an empty > asm/fiq.h file. Thanks Catalin, Thanks Russell. I will do this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists