linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5406F8BC.7000503@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:17:16 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>
CC:	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support


>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>>>>> +#define ACPI_MAX_GIC_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES  65535
>>>>> With GICv2? I doubt it.
>>>> I will create macro for each GIC driver:
>>>> #define ACPI_MAX_GICV2_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES    8
>>>> #define ACPI_MAX_GICV3_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES    65535
>>> Where do you get this value (ACPI_MAX_GICV3_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES) from?
>> This value is for max processors entries in MADT, and we will use it to scan MADT
>> for SMP/GIC Init, I just make it big enough for GICv3/4. since ACPI core will stop
>> scan MADT if the real numbers of processors entries are reached no matter
>> how big ACPI_MAX_GICV3_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES is, I think we can just
>> define a number big enough then it will work (x86 and ia64 did the same thing).
> Also, with GICv3++, there is no such thing as a memory-mapped CPU
> interface anymore. What you get is a bunch of redistributors (one per
> CPU). I assume what you have here actually describe the redistributors,
> and its name should reflect that.

As Sudeep said, it is not to link to GIC architecture, so I think we can keep
it stick with ACPI spec, in ACPI spec, it called "GICC structure" (section 5.2.12.14
in ACPI 5.1), so we can name it as ACPI_MAX_GICC_STRUCTURE_ENTRIES no matter
GICv2 or GICv3/4 (with GICv2, it may have more than 8 entries with some disabled
ones, will no more than 8 enabled entries).

What do you think?

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/