[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140903113205.GN4783@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:32:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] perf_event: fix a race condition in
perf_remove_from_context()
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 03:27:20PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
>
> We saw a kernel soft lockup in perf_remove_from_context(),
> it looks like the `perf` process, when exiting, could not go
> out of the retry loop. Meanwhile, the target process was forking
> a child. So either the target process should execute the smp
> function call to deactive the event (if it was running) or it should
> do a context switch which deactives the event.
>
> It seems we optimize out a context switch in perf_event_context_sched_out(),
> and what's more important, we still test an obsolete task pointer when
> retrying, so no one actually would deactive that event in this situation.
> Fix it directly by reloading the task pointer in perf_remove_from_context().
> This should cure the above soft lockup.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists