[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409031424170.3333@nanos>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:25:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"shawn.guo@...escale.com" <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"jonas@...thpole.se" <jonas@...thpole.se>,
"shc_work@...l.ru" <shc_work@...l.ru>,
"baohua@...nel.org" <baohua@...nel.org>,
"maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
"khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>,
"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
"larry.bassel@...aro.org" <larry.bassel@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi"
<stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
"vkale@....com" <vkale@....com>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/26] genirq: fix use of irq_find_mapping outside of
legal RCU context
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> [Dropping linux@...nrisc.net from the CC list]
>
> On 03/09/14 13:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:33:44AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 26 2014 at 10:34:51 pm BST, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> A number of irqchip drivers are directly calling irq_find_mapping,
> >>>>> which may use a rcu_read_lock call when walking the radix tree.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Turns out that if you hit that point with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU enabled,
> >>>>> the kernel will shout at you, as using RCU in this context may be
> >>>>> illegal (specially if coming from the idle state, where RCU would be
> >>>>> in a quiescent state).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A possible fix would be to wrap calls to irq_find_mapping into a
> >>>>> RCU_NONIDLE macro, but that really looks ugly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch series introduce another generic IRQ entry point
> >>>>> (handle_domain_irq), which has the exact same behaviour as handle_IRQ
> >>>>> (as defined on arm, arm64 and openrisc), except that it also takes a
> >>>>> irq_domain pointer. This allows the logical IRQ lookup to be done
> >>>>> inside the irq_{enter,exit} section, which contains a
> >>>>> rcu_irq_{enter,exit}, making it safe.
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks good. Should this be routed to the genirq tree?
> >>>
> >>> I'm happy for you to take this series, provided the architecture
> >>> maintainers agree on it (I'm still to hear from the openrisc guys, and
> >>> their mailing-list seems to positively hate my guts).
> >>
> >> I think everyone's had a chance to look over it by now. Thomas, shall I
> >> take the series?
> >
> > Yes please.
>
> Do you want a pull request? Or are you picking up the patches from the ML?
Did you pick up the Acked/Reviewed/Ignored-by tags?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists