[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <54070FD8.6060409@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:55:52 +0300
From: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] integrity: move integrity subsystem options to a
separate menu
On 03/09/14 15:35, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 10:29 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> Integrity subsystem got lots of options and takes more than half
>> of security menu.
>>
>> This patch moves integrity subsystem options to a separate menu.
>> It does not affect existing configuration. Re-configuration is
>> not needed.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - previous patch moved integrity out of the 'security' menu.
>> This version keeps integrity as a security option (Mimi).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> security/integrity/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> security/integrity/evm/Kconfig | 9 +--------
>> security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 3 +--
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/Kconfig b/security/integrity/Kconfig
>> index f79d853..a734a83 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/integrity/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
>> #
>> config INTEGRITY
>> - def_bool y
>> - depends on IMA || EVM
>> + bool "Integrity subsystem support"
>> + depends on SECURITY
>> + default y
>> +
>> +if INTEGRITY
>> +
>> +menu "Options"
>> +
> Instead of moving everything to a separate menu, I would leave the
> ability to enable/disable IMA and EVM on the security page, but move
> their options to separate pages. So unless someone wants to change the
> default options, they're hidden.
>
> There are Kconfig examples for enabling the option in the parent
> directory and clicking on the option brings up a separate menu (eg. NET,
> WIRELESS).
Hi,
I posted this patch already 3 times before. This is 4th time.
In last post you answered:
"Agreed, but this patch moves integrity out of the 'security' menu. The
following keeps integrity as a security option."
Now you tell me this?
- Dmitry
>> config INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE
>> boolean "Digital signature verification using multiple keyrings"
>> @@ -46,3 +52,7 @@ config INTEGRITY_AUDIT
>>
>> source security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> source security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
>> +
>> +endmenu
>> +
>> +endif # if INTEGRITY
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig b/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
>> index d606f3d..df20a2f 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> config EVM
>> boolean "EVM support"
>> - depends on SECURITY
>> + depends on INTEGRITY
> By adding the "if INTEGRITY", the "depends on INTEGRITY" is redundant.
> Please remove the depends here and in the other places.
>
> Mimi
>
>> select KEYS
>> select ENCRYPTED_KEYS
>> select CRYPTO_HMAC
>> @@ -12,10 +12,6 @@ config EVM
>>
>> If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
>>
>> -if EVM
>> -
>> -menu "EVM options"
>> -
>> config EVM_ATTR_FSUUID
>> bool "FSUUID (version 2)"
>> default y
>> @@ -47,6 +43,3 @@ config EVM_EXTRA_SMACK_XATTRS
>> additional info to the calculation, requires existing EVM
>> labeled file systems to be relabeled.
>>
>> -endmenu
>> -
>> -endif
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> index 08758fb..2477d1e 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
>> @@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
>> #
>> config IMA
>> bool "Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA)"
>> - depends on SECURITY
>> - select INTEGRITY
>> + depends on INTEGRITY
>> select SECURITYFS
>> select CRYPTO
>> select CRYPTO_HMAC
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists