[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140903162528.GA1733@iron>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:25:28 +0200
From: Loic Pefferkorn <loic@...cp.eu>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] staging: goldfish: document spinlock usage
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 01:13:19PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> This tells the reader nothing. It's good to document locking models but
>
> - you lock data not code (which is a detail a lot of programmers get wrong
> in th design stage too)
> - you need to document what objects are protected by the lock
>
>
> So it should tell the reader what the lock must be held to do
>
> If you look at the audio code it actually protects the status field and
> status register of the "hardware"
Hello,
Thank you for the feedback, I will send a v2.
--
Cheers,
Loïc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists