[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1409714246-31054-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:17:22 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 net-next 0/4] load imm64 insn and uapi/linux/bpf.h
Hi,
V8->V9
- rebase on top of Hannes's patch in the same area [1]
- no changes to patches 1 and 2
- added patches 3 and 4 as RFC to address Daniel's concern.
patch 3 moves eBPF instruction macros and
patch 4 split macros which are shared between classic and eBPF
into bpf_common.h
3 and 4 will be used by verifier testsuite and will be reposted later
during stage III
V8 thread with 'why' reasoning and end goal:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/27/628
Original set [2] of ~28 patches I'm planning to present in 4 stages:
I. this 2 patches to fork off llvm upstreaming
II. bpf syscall with manpage and map implementation
III. bpf program load/unload with verifier testsuite (1st user of
instruction macros from bpf.h and 1st user of load imm64 insn)
IV. tracing, etc
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385266/
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/26/859
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists