[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140903175606.GA9740@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:56:06 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/26] tty: Convert tty_struct bitfield to bools
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:10:45AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 08:19 AM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> >> Ahh. Thanks for the insight, Alan.
> >>
> >> But set_bit() et. al. will generate an incredible amount of churn;
> >> what if I split the fields up to prevent false-sharing?
> >
> > Do you feel lucky ;-)
>
> Hahaha :)
>
> > I'd rather set_bit and friends were used. They exist largely for this
> > kind of reason and they also have atomic test/set methods which may in
> > the longer term be very useful.
> >
> > Yes it is churn can't argue with that.
>
> Yuck. There should be a better way. IXANY mode is suddenly going to
> have a ton of unnecessary bus locks on x86.
True, but at least it will be correct, which I'm guessing today it isn't
:(
> Note the ctrl_status field is a byte as well, which can't be RMW'ed by
> the bit-locked primitives, and definitely should not be aggregated with
> any adjacent field.
Never trust what an ia64 compiler can, and will, do...
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists