[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1409770842.911.18.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:00:42 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
luca@...lho.fi, kvalo@...rom.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] firmware coredump: add new firmware coredump class
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:38 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> Overall I think this looks pretty sensible. The thing that worries me
> though is firmware which might crash repeatedly in a short period of
> time, resulting in a proliferation of coredumps and eating up all
> available RAM. How about a limit of one active coredump per device or
> something similar?
Oh, right, I completely forgot about that. Not sure what context I can
iterate the class device list, but worst case I have to add another
list.
We likely want to store the first dump then, I suppose?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists