[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476dc5c4-557d-467c-9583-201b10b7e1df@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:52:13 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Karol Wrona <k.wrona@...sung.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] iio: Add sensorhub driver
On September 3, 2014 3:55:44 PM GMT+01:00, Karol Wrona <k.wrona@...sung.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>This patchset adds support for sensorhub. It is an external mcu which
>manages
>and collects data from several sensors i.e. on Galaxy Gear 2 watch.
>
>It contains:
>- spi driver for sensorhub device
>- DT binding for the device
>- IIO common utils for ssp sensors, a trigger module
>- IIO accelerometer driver
>- IIO gyroscope driver
>
>Generally this is an attempt to generalize sensors handling on some
>Samsung
>boards which have multiple sensors IC and also sensorhub does some data
>processing itself.
>
>I would like to get your opinion about such solution. The idea is that
>data communication layer gives control and data to proper IIO sensor
>devices.
>In this case I chose that sensor drivers are platform ones represented
>by
>child nodes of sensorhub in DT. These compatibles are used mainly to
>match
>sensor to driver. For example at this stage there is one accelerometer
>but on
>other board can have different one with changed data format etc. In
>this case
>ssp_accel_sensor driver could handle several physical devices of accel
>class.
>Unfortunately the firmware gives only an information about used sensor
>type,
>the driver can find out that there is an accelerometer on board but
>nothing
>specific about the sensor.
Will look at this later... In the meantime..
>
>Other question:
>The sensorhub can implement some devices which are non common for IIO
>and hard
>to standardise. These ones need two way communication (raw write will
>not be
>proper for that) and can produce data packets with flexible size to
>2KB).
>I'm wondering if it is worth to look for solution in IIO and implement
>something like IIO_BULK sensor with no standard channel description
>or solve this problem using cdev. This is the reason why the part of
>the
>patchset is intended to be placed in misc.
Out of curiosity, what are these other sensors, roughly? If they are popular I am
sure there will be more out there soon! Ideally we would work out how to standardize these. So convince is it can't be
done!
>
>Regards,
>Karol
>
>Karol Wrona (6):
> iio:sensorhub: Add sensorhub common library
> misc: sensorhub: Add sensorhub driver
> sensorhub: Add sensorhub bindings
> iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub iio commons
> iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub accelerometer sensor
> iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub gyroscope sensor
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/misc/sensorhub.txt | 51 ++
> drivers/iio/accel/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/iio/accel/ssp_accel_sensor.c | 240 ++++++
> drivers/iio/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/iio/common/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/Kconfig | 15 +
> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/Makefile | 6 +
> .../iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp-sensor-trigger.c | 92 +++
> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c | 35 +
> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio_sensor.h | 62 ++
> drivers/iio/gyro/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/iio/gyro/ssp_gyro_sensor.c | 225 ++++++
> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/sensorhub/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/misc/sensorhub/Makefile | 8 +
> drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp.h | 323 ++++++++
> drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_data.c | 61 ++
>drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_dev.c | 782
>++++++++++++++++++++
>drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_firmware.c | 571
>++++++++++++++
>drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_spi.c | 700
>++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/iio/common/ssp_sensors.h | 82 ++
> 22 files changed, 3274 insertions(+)
>create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sensorhub.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/accel/ssp_accel_sensor.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp-sensor-trigger.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio_sensor.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/gyro/ssp_gyro_sensor.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_data.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_dev.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_firmware.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/sensorhub/ssp_spi.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/iio/common/ssp_sensors.h
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists