[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGo_u6qkjb0N05XYGHrR6ag8eBCG=b+5NtSeA8E9SdgTw07A1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:31:44 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
dt list <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: mfd: twl4030-power: Use
the standard 'ti,system-power-controller' to mark power control
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:06:47PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Optional properties:
>> -- ti,use_poweroff: With this flag, the chip will initiates an ACTIVE-to-OFF or
>> - SLEEP-to-OFF transition when the system poweroffs.
>> +
>> +- ti,system-power-controller OR ti,use_poweroff: This indicates that
>> + TWL4030 is the power supply master of the system. With this flag, the
>> + chip will initiates an ACTIVE-to-OFF or SLEEP-to-OFF transition when
>> + the system poweroffs.
>
> I suggest the following wording:
>
> - ti,system-power-controller: This indicates that TWL4030 is the
> power supply master of the system. With this flag, the chip will
> initiates an ACTIVE-to-OFF or SLEEP-to-OFF transition when the
> system poweroffs.
>
> - ti,use_poweroff: Deprecated name for ti,system-power-controller
Yes, this does indeed sound better. if no one has a different opinion
or further comments, will update this patch tomorrow.
--
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists