[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54077D61.3030707@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:43:13 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Fix formula to calculate fair share of tags
On 09/03/2014 02:33 PM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Fair share of tags is number of tags diveded on number
> of users. Not sure why it is different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index d1eb579..1b9c949 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> /*
> * Allow at least some tags
> */
> - depth = max((bt->depth + users - 1) / users, 4U);
> + depth = max(bt->depth / users, 4U);
> return atomic_read(&hctx->nr_active) < depth;
It's normal rounding, you'll round down otherwise. Say you have a tag
depth of 31 (SATA), and 4 active users. Your change would make that 7
tags per user, leaving 3 idle. If you round up, you end up with 8 tags
instead. That will potentially just leave some sleeping for a new tag,
but at least you'll exhaust the space.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists