linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 082/125] x86,mm: fix pte_special versus pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140903220626.131400948@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  3 Sep 2014 15:07:19 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 082/125] x86,mm: fix pte_special versus pte_numa

3.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>

commit b38af4721f59d0b564468f623b3e52a638195015 upstream.

Sasha Levin has shown oopses on ffffea0003480048 and ffffea0003480008 at
mm/memory.c:1132, running Trinity on different 3.16-rc-next kernels:
where zap_pte_range() checks page->mapping to see if PageAnon(page).

Those addresses fit struct pages for pfns d2001 and d2000, and in each
dump a register or a stack slot showed d2001730 or d2000730: pte flags
0x730 are PCD ACCESSED PROTNONE SPECIAL IOMAP; and Sasha's e820 map has
a hole between cfffffff and 100000000, which would need special access.

Commit c46a7c817e66 ("x86: define _PAGE_NUMA by reusing software bits on
the PMD and PTE levels") has broken vm_normal_page(): a PROTNONE SPECIAL
pte no longer passes the pte_special() test, so zap_pte_range() goes on
to try to access a non-existent struct page.

Fix this by refining pte_special() (SPECIAL with PRESENT or PROTNONE) to
complement pte_numa() (SPECIAL with neither PRESENT nor PROTNONE).  A
hint that this was a problem was that c46a7c817e66 added pte_numa() test
to vm_normal_page(), and moved its is_zero_pfn() test from slow to fast
path: This was papering over a pte_special() snag when the zero page was
encountered during zap.  This patch reverts vm_normal_page() to how it
was before, relying on pte_special().

It still appears that this patch may be incomplete: aren't there other
places which need to be handling PROTNONE along with PRESENT?  For
example, pte_mknuma() clears _PAGE_PRESENT and sets _PAGE_NUMA, but on a
PROT_NONE area, that would make it pte_special().  This is side-stepped
by the fact that NUMA hinting faults skipped PROT_NONE VMAs and there
are no grounds where a NUMA hinting fault on a PROT_NONE VMA would be
interesting.

Fixes: c46a7c817e66 ("x86: define _PAGE_NUMA by reusing software bits on the PMD and PTE levels")
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |    9 +++++++--
 mm/memory.c                    |    7 +++----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -131,8 +131,13 @@ static inline int pte_exec(pte_t pte)
 
 static inline int pte_special(pte_t pte)
 {
-	return (pte_flags(pte) & (_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_SPECIAL)) ==
-				 (_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_SPECIAL);
+	/*
+	 * See CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING pte_numa in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h.
+	 * On x86 we have _PAGE_BIT_NUMA == _PAGE_BIT_GLOBAL+1 ==
+	 * __PAGE_BIT_SOFTW1 == _PAGE_BIT_SPECIAL.
+	 */
+	return (pte_flags(pte) & _PAGE_SPECIAL) &&
+		(pte_flags(pte) & (_PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_PROTNONE));
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long pte_pfn(pte_t pte)
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_ar
 	unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
 
 	if (HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL) {
-		if (likely(!pte_special(pte) || pte_numa(pte)))
+		if (likely(!pte_special(pte)))
 			goto check_pfn;
 		if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP))
 			return NULL;
@@ -777,15 +777,14 @@ struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_ar
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (is_zero_pfn(pfn))
+		return NULL;
 check_pfn:
 	if (unlikely(pfn > highest_memmap_pfn)) {
 		print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (is_zero_pfn(pfn))
-		return NULL;
-
 	/*
 	 * NOTE! We still have PageReserved() pages in the page tables.
 	 * eg. VDSO mappings can cause them to exist.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/