[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA82zX-yodXYB+4vVrjq7tVe=wV4v3iCQ7O1a1HLFX_B1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:33:43 +0100
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
To: "long.wanglong" <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, nico@...aro.org,
Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk" <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
santosh.shilimkar@...com,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [SMP BUG?] the return value of is_smp() is bug?
On 4 September 2014 02:13, long.wanglong <long.wanglong@...wei.com> wrote:
> When i revert the commit bc41b8724f24, the secondary core can boot.
> The problem is that qemu doesn't provide emulation of the SCU base
> address register. When reading the SCU base, qemu just return 0.
You need to upgrade your QEMU -- we improved the emulation
of all our Cortex-A9 boards to make sure they set valid values
for the base address register, in order to fix exactly this regression.
QEMU 2.0 or later should work.
(As an aside, I think the Aegis quirk test is pretty ugly:
"base address happens to be set to zero" is not exactly
a very reliable way to identify a particular SoC. However
in this case QEMU was emulating real h/w insufficiently
accurately, so we fixed it.)
thanks
-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists