[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904123845.GA19925@localhost>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:38:45 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>,
Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>,
LKP <lkp@...org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [percpu] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at (null)
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:16:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:55:58AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > Added by ac1bea85781e (sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() report RCU quiescent
> > > states), removed by 4a81e8328d379 (rcu: Reduce overhead of cond_resched()
> > > checks for RCU). So, as you say, no effect on contemporary kernels.
> >
> > Well not sure what to make out of all of this....
>
> Yep, still confused as to how the patch adding the definition could have
> caused a failure. Fengguang, any thoughts?
Yeah this is confusing.. I checked carefully and find that commit
0e98023 and afea227 are built on 2 quite different servers -- which
might generate slightly different code. I'll fix this issue and make
the build server selection more consistent.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists