linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A01E6B3A6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:59:54 +0000
From:	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>
CC:	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Liu, Changcheng" <changcheng.liu@...el.com>,
	"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>,
	"Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if_idle() to wake up the
 idle cpu



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezcano@...aro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:53 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng; peterz@...radead.org; luto@...capital.net;
> rjw@...ysocki.net; mingo@...hat.com
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Liu, Changcheng;
> Wang, Xiaoming; Chakravarty, Souvik K
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if_idle() to wake up the
> idle cpu
> 
> On 09/04/2014 09:17 AM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> > Implementing one new API wake_up_if_idle(), which is used to
> > wake up the idle CPU.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> 
> Hi Chuanseng,
> 
> in the future, please prefix the patches with the version number and a
> changelog.
> 
Thanks your advice, Daniel, will do that next time:)