[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904154020.GF346@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:40:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq
work interrupt
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:33:40PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Why not something like the below; then it becomes a compile time matter.
>
> Problem is that some archs only have that information at runtime.
> See x86 for example which tests cpu_has_apic.
So the other archs can still benefit, no? Also, on x86 cpu features can
be used with asm_goto/jump_labels, your approach wrecks that too by
copying it into some static variable, see static_cpu_has().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists