[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201409041803.46098.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:03:45 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code
On Thursday 04 September 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 15:00 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On 16.07.2014 12:24, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > >> -config S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR
> > >> - bool
> > >> - help
> > >> - Internal configuration to get and set correct GPIO driver strength
> > >> - helper
> > >> -
> > >
> > > This one is used (as a macro) in drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c. Is a patch
> > > that touches that macro queued somewhere?
> >
> > The code you mention should be removed as well as it's no longer needed.
> > Will include in a follow-up series. Thanks for reporting this and
> > remaining missed parts.
>
> That check for CONFIG_S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR is still present in v3.17-rc3 and
> next-20140903. Should I submit the trivial patch to remove it (and the
> dead code it hides)?
>
Yes, I think this one is an obvious candidate for removal.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists