linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] ftrace: Add a ftrace test collection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:42:51 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] ftrace: Add a ftrace test collection

On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:06:32 +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the collection of testcases for ftrace version 3.
> This is just some updates and fixes according to the 
> discussion at previous version.
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/26/304
>
> The major updates are:
>  - Fix some expressions to work on dash (Thanks Luis!)
>  - Support UNRESOLVED/UNTESTED/UNSUPPORTED results for testcase.
>    Those are POSIX 1003.3 standard.
>    (see http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/manual/x47.html for
>     more details)
>  - Fix to show error logs.
>
> ftracetest is a small dash script for testing ftrace features.
> It will be required to add a unit test for each new feature
> after this is merged, because of preventing feature regressions.
>
> This version still be out of the selftest. However, at the kernel
> summit, I talked with Shuah about that. And since the kselftest
> will be the standard kernel unit test framework, I agreed to
> move this under the selftest. But I also would like to ask Steven
> and Namhyung to agree with it before moving.
>
> Actually, since we've already has similar shell-script base
> testcase under kselftest, we can easily move this under
> selftests.

By [k]selftest, did you mean tools/testing/selftests/ ?

Anyway I have no objection to the move.

Thanks for your work!
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/