[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904174704.GB16935@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:47:04 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] security: make security_file_set_fowner,
f_setown and __f_setown void return
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:38:28AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> security_file_set_fowner always returns 0, so make it f_setown and
> __f_setown void return functions and fix up the error handling in the
> callers.
All the LSMs seems to use this purely for setting up pointers, and not
having to handle errors in the locking code for it will make life a lot
simpler. I like this a lot.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists