[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5407EF92.1060508@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:50:26 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
satoru.takeuchi@...il.com, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/55] 3.10.54-stable review
On 09/03/2014 04:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 03:04:50PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.54 release.
>> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Fri Sep 5 22:04:21 UTC 2014.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.54-rc1.gz
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> -rc2 is now out to resolve some reported errors:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.54-rc2.gz
>
>
Build results:
total: 137 pass: 137 fail: 0
Most of the qemu tests passed except for mips:smp, which crashes with
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kjournald/44
This is not a new problem, but an old one discovered due to an added
qemu test. I sent you a reference to a patch to fix this problem
a couple of weeks ago. Let me know if I should resend it.
Detailed test results are available at
http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists