lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:23:25 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Zoran Markovic <zrn.markovic@...il.com> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Arve Hjonnevag <arve@...roid.com>, Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pm: prevent suspend until power supply events are processed On 4 September 2014 10:21, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote: >>> >> + /* dependent power supplies (e.g. battery) may have changed >>> >> + * state as a result of this event, so poll again and hold >>> >> + * the wakeup_source until all events are processed. >>> >> + */ But isn't this comment still incorrect? Its not about dependent supplies but the race between the work-handler and its enqueuing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists