linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] pm: prevent suspend until power supply events are processed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpomn5SUmmjs=p6DSCHv-Ec4sv_1VRjVa1NV0waUk0rpd9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:23:25 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Zoran Markovic <zrn.markovic@...il.com>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Arve Hjonnevag <arve@...roid.com>,
	Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pm: prevent suspend until power supply events are processed

On 4 September 2014 10:21, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> >> +       /* dependent power supplies (e.g. battery) may have changed
>>> >> +        * state as a result of this event, so poll again and hold
>>> >> +        * the wakeup_source until all events are processed.
>>> >> +        */

But isn't this comment still incorrect? Its not about dependent supplies
but the race between the work-handler and its enqueuing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/