linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_opp: Fixed the order of argument for kcalloc.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <156662991.4EXBqE3pLR@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:48 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Anand Moon <moon.linux@...oo.com>, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_opp: Fixed the order of argument for kcalloc.

On Thursday, September 04, 2014 02:07:49 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/16/14 02:22, Anand Moon wrote:
> > These changes fix the argument to the kcalloc
> >         @n: number of elements.
> >         @size: element size.
> >         @flags: the type of memory to allocate (see kmalloc).
> >
> >         void *kcalloc(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <moon.linux@...oo.com>
> > ---
> 
> Oops.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Can this be picked up?

It could be if I could find it.  Which is not the case, unfortunately.

Anybody care to resend it?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/