[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuz6zraph_8xXW43bNbh5uPRki0yOufMfV5pKMRLhDrQQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:41:48 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 net-next 2/4] net: filter: split filter.h and expose
eBPF to user space
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 05:17 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>
>> allow user space to generate eBPF programs
>>
>> uapi/linux/bpf.h: eBPF instruction set definition
>>
>> linux/filter.h: the rest
>>
>> This patch only moves macro definitions, but practically it freezes
>> existing
>> eBPF instruction set, though new instructions can still be added in the
>> future.
>>
>> These eBPF definitions cannot go into uapi/linux/filter.h, since the names
>> may conflict with existing applications.
>>
>> Full eBPF ISA description is in Documentation/networking/filter.txt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>
>
> Ok, given you post the remaining two RFCs later on this window as
> you indicate, I have no objections:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
David,
I see that all 4 patches are marked as rfc, whereas I tagged
only 3 and 4 as 'rfc' and mentioned in cover letter that they
will be coming for real in stage III. Here they support patch 2
and show the future changes to bpf.h file.
Patches 1 and 2 are good to go.
Note that they're on top of Hannes's patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385266/
Do you want me to resubmit just first two?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists