[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54095835.7000207@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:29:09 +0200
From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10.y+] PM / sleep: Use valid_state() for platform-dependent
sleep states only
Hello,
On 09/04/2014 11:21 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> [Upstream commit 43e8317b0bba1d6eb85f38a4a233d82d7c20d732]
>
> Use the observation that, for platform-dependent sleep states
> (PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY, PM_SUSPEND_MEM), a given state is either
> always supported or always unsupported and store that information
> in pm_states[] instead of calling valid_state() every time we
> need to check it.
>
> Also do not use valid_state() for PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE, which is always
> valid, and move the pm_test_level validity check for PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE
> directly into enter_state().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.10+: 27ddcc6596e5: PM / sleep: Add state field to pm_states[] entries
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.10+
> ---
> This is a backport request for these two commits upstream:
>
> 27ddcc6596e5 PM / sleep: Add state field to pm_states[] entries
> 43e8317b0bba PM / sleep: Use valid_state() for platform-dependent sleep states only
>
Wouldn't it be cleaner to have 2 separate backports then ?
Thanks for the backport anyways.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists