[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5409BBA8.8080202@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:33:28 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Kiryukhin <vksavl@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk-rcar-gen2: RCAN clock support
Hello.
On 09/05/2014 01:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Add RCAN clock support to the R-Car generation 2 CPG driver. This clock
>>> gets
>>> derived from the USB_EXTAL clock by dividing it by 6. The layout of
>>> RCANCKCR
>>> register is close to those of the clocks supported by the 'clk-div6'
>>> driver
>>> but has no divider field, and so can't be supported by that driver...
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>>> ---
>>> The patch is against the 'clk-next' branch of Mike Turquette's 'linux.git'
>>> repo.
>>> drivers/clk/shmobile/clk-rcar-gen2.c | 99
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
>> More than a months has passed, there hasn't been any feedback, patch
>> hasn't been applied... what's wrong with it?
> Sorry for missing this, it went under my radar.
> I'm not a clock expert (pulling in Laurent), but it looks fine to me.
> I'm just wondering whether you can simplify the code by using clk-gate?
The gated clocks inherit their clock rate from the parent, while the RCAN
clock has a fixed divisor (6). I'm gonna look into composite clocks instead.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> Geert
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists