linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140905135816.GE20164@leverpostej>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:58:16 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Machine name from board description is some generic name
> > > > on DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
> > > > specific for board, so use it instead generic one when
> > > > possible.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |    7 +++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > > > b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c index 8a16ee5..fbc7b4f 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > > > @@ -875,10 +875,13 @@ void __init setup_arch(char
> > > > **cmdline_p)
> > > > 
> > > >  	setup_processor();
> > > >  	mdesc = setup_machine_fdt(__atags_pointer);
> > > > 
> > > > -	if (!mdesc)
> > > > +	if (mdesc)
> > > > +		machine_name = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
> > > > +	else
> > > > 
> > > >  		mdesc = setup_machine_tags(__atags_pointer,
> > > > 
> > > > __machine_arch_type); machine_desc = mdesc;
> > > > -	machine_name = mdesc->name;
> > > > +	if (!machine_name)
> > > > +		machine_name = mdesc->name;
> > > > 
> > > >  	if (mdesc->reboot_mode != REBOOT_HARD)
> > > >  	
> > > >  		reboot_mode = mdesc->reboot_mode;
> > > 
> > > So, do you really want to break userspace which reading file
> > > /proc/cpuinfo (after migration from boardcode --> DT)?
> > 
> > You have no guarantee model name in the DT == the name in a
> > board file anyhow, and trying to force that is wrong. So
> > further to Russell's reply, I must NAK this from a DT
> > perspective.
> > 
> > Realistically your userspace is already broken if relying on
> > such things. You built something that only ever worked for a
> > particular arbitrary string. So it was already broken for
> > every other board, and there was never any guarantee that new
> > boards where your userspace could have worked would share the
> > same name.
> > 
> > You're trying to fix the wrong side of the equation.
> > 
> > Mark.
> 
> So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type) which 
> will work with any kernel (and will not be broken again by kernel 
> later)?

Without knowing your use case I have no idea if that's even a sane thing
to do.

Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/