[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5409D5D0.8060801@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:25:04 +0200
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: dgilbert@...erlog.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise
module removal
On 09/05/14 15:56, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> With scsi-mq I think many LLDs probably have a new
> race possibility between a surprise rmmod of the LLD
> and another thread presenting a new command at about
> the same time (or another thread's command completing
> around that time). Does anything above the LLD stop
> this happening?
>
> Looking at mpt3sas and hpsa module exit calls, they don't
> seem to guard against this possibility.
>
> The test is pretty easy: build the LLD as a module, load
> it and fire up a multi-thread, libaio fio test on one or
> more devices (SSDs would probably be good) on that LLD.
> While the test is running, do 'rmmod LLD'.
An LLD must call scsi_remove_host() directly or indirectly from the
module cleanup path. scsi_remove_host() triggers a call to
blk_cleanup_queue(). That last function sets the flag QUEUE_FLAG_DYING
which prevents that new I/O is queued and waits until previously queued
requests have finished before returning.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists