[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761h2ap9f.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:23:56 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix build-id matching on vmlinux
Hi Stephane,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:37:51 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
>> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
>> by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
>> version when finding vmlinux"), there's a remaining problem still.
>>
>> When perf records samples, it synthesizes the kernel map using
>> machine__mmap_name() and ref_reloc_sym like "[kernel.kallsyms]_text".
>> You can easily see it using 'perf report -D' command.
>>
>> After finishing record, it goes through the recorded events to find
>> maps/dsos actually used. And then record build-id info of them.
>>
>> During this process, it needs to load symbols in a dso and it'd call
>> dso__load_vmlinux() since the default value of the symbol_conf.try_
>> vmlinux_path is true. However it changes dso->long_name to a real
>> path of the vmlinux file (e.g. /lib/modules/3.16.0-rc2+/build/vmlinux)
>> if one is running on a custom kernel.
>>
>> It resulted in that perf report reads the build-id of the vmlinux, but
>> cannot use it since it only knows about the [kernel.kallsyms] map. It
>> then falls back to possible vmlinux paths by using the recorded kernel
>> version (in case of a recent version) or a running kernel silently
>> (which might break the result). I think it's worth going to the
>> stable tree.
>>
>> I can think of a couple of ways to fix it. In this patch, I changed
>> to use the name of "[kernel.kallsyms]" for the kernel build-id event
>> instead of not trying vmlinux paths. This way we can provide maximum
>> info (like annotation) with minimum change IMHO.
>>
>> Before:
>>
>> $ perf record -a usleep 1
>>
>> $ perf buildid-list
>> 00d5ff078efe1d30b8492854f259215fd877ce30 /lib/modules/3.16.0-rc2+/build/vmlinux
>> 78186287bba77069a056a5ccbeb14b7fd2ca3a4b /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so
>> 4eadca6cb82e0a85edb87c15b5e3980742514501 /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
>> 1e272ca30081e81ef41935a630eb2f4c636798b4 /usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so
>>
>> $ perf buildid-list -H
>> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 78186287bba77069a056a5ccbeb14b7fd2ca3a4b /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so
>> 4eadca6cb82e0a85edb87c15b5e3980742514501 /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
>> 1e272ca30081e81ef41935a630eb2f4c636798b4 /usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so
>> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 /tmp/perf-2523.map
>>
> There is something I don't understand in your example above. The -H
> option shows only DSO with samples. So why do you get the buildid
> without -H and you get no buildid with -H? In other words, I don't
> connect the dots between what -H does on the buildid change for the
> kernel. Looks like you have the buildid in the perf.data file.
Without -H, it just prints all DSOs found in build-id table (rebuilt
during read perf data file header) and skips processing events. But
with -H, it'd process the event records and so set kernel map to
'[kernel.kallsyms]' - since the kernel mmap event always has the name -
and mark it as hit. Thus the actual vmlinux can't be marked and then
cannot be printed.
Hmm.. now I'm curious that why the -H option is needed at all.. the perf
record already wrote build-ids that are actually hits..
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists