[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F71A0899-EF6F-44A3-B207-E1DACC8721B6@cern.ch>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +0000
From: Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@...n.ch>
To: Peter Kieser <peter@...ser.ca>, "eddie@...k.net" <eddie@...k.net>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kmo@...erainc.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser <peter@...ser.ca>
wrote:
>
> On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
>>> all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
>>> cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be
>>> a good time to pipe up.
>>
>> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and backport these though :-)
>>
>> Eddie
>
> I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production.
>
> -Peter
>
More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider scale now.
If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel.
Cheers,
Arne
--
Arne Wiebalck
CERN IT
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4311 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists