linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/5] usb: host: ehci-st: Add EHCI support for ST STB devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:57:28 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
	patrice.chotard@...com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/5] usb: host: ehci-st: Add EHCI support for ST STB devices

On Friday 05 September 2014 18:23:45 Peter Griffin wrote:
> +struct st_platform_priv {
> +       struct clk *clks[USB_MAX_CLKS];
> +       struct clk *clk48;
> +       struct reset_control *rst;
> +       struct reset_control *pwr;
> +       struct phy *phy;
> +};

Any reason why this is in a shared header file? It looks like
duplicating the structure under two different names would
actually be shorter and keep the drivers more readable as they'd
be self-contained, even when they have the exact same structure.

Do both drivers use all fields?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/