[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3890179.kgPZYmEVZm@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:30:49 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
patrice.chotard@...com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/5] usb: host: ehci-st: Add EHCI support for ST STB devices
On Friday 05 September 2014 19:16:36 Peter Griffin wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Sep 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Friday 05 September 2014 18:23:45 Peter Griffin wrote:
> > > +struct st_platform_priv {
> > > + struct clk *clks[USB_MAX_CLKS];
> > > + struct clk *clk48;
> > > + struct reset_control *rst;
> > > + struct reset_control *pwr;
> > > + struct phy *phy;
> > > +};
> >
> > Any reason why this is in a shared header file? It looks like
> > duplicating the structure under two different names would
> > actually be shorter and keep the drivers more readable as they'd
> > be self-contained, even when they have the exact same structure.
>
> The only reason was it was a identical structure so I put it in a shared
> header file. I can unabstract it if you want?
Yes, I think that would be an improvement. Everything looks great to me
otherwise, at least after a brief look.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists