| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20140905.122539.670916286627732128.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:25:39 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: cwang@...pensource.com Cc: hannes@...essinduktion.org, sd@...asysnail.net, tt.rantala@...il.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trinity@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for anycast and multicast From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:23:37 -0700 > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa > <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote: >> >> What games are you playing? You know how patches are processed by David >> and I even let him the choice by pointing out a problem in your patch so >> that you could an update and send v2. > > I assume David goes over all the discussion before applying any patch. > So in the original discussion, obviously I disagree with your point on RCU, > and sent my own version. I thought the retention of RCU locking was reasonable, and that your feedback was something I disagreed with. This is different from ignoring your feedback. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists