[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140905195439.GU4783@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:54:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yan Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Subject: Re: Possible race between CPU hotplug and perf_pmu_migrate_context
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:31:49AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So quite frankly, the whole perf_pmu_migrate_context() thing looks
> completely and fundamentally broken.
Yes, agreed. We can go play very nasty games, but fundamentally agreed.
> Or even just say: "if somebody takes down a CPU with existing uncore
> events, those events are now effectively dead". Don't try to migrate
> them, don't try to create new events on another CPU, just let it go.
> The CPU is down, the events are inactive.
>
> Keep it simple. Not the current completely broken thing that clearly
> doesn't honor the actual real rules for "event->ctx". Because the
> current rules are effectively that event->ctx is a constant over the
> whole lifetime of the event. Agreed?
I like this best, I've never really been a supporter of hotplug games.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists