[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540A206A.6070503@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:43:22 -0400
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: keystone: add a pci quirk to limit mrrs
On 09/05/2014 04:40 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@...com> wrote:
>> On 09/05/2014 03:23 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 03:45:32PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Keystone PCI controller has a limitation that memory read request
>>>> size must not exceed 256 bytes. This is a hardware limitation and
>>>> add a quirk to force this limit on all downstream devices by
>>>> updating mrrs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> -v2: made the quirk happens after tuning
>>>> -v1: changed printk to indicate PCI bdf
>>>> This applies on top of the Keystone PCI controller patch series
>>>> at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/33523
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c | 40
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
>>>> b/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
>>>> index c1cfaef..a132622 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
>>>> @@ -42,8 +42,48 @@
>>>> /* DEV_STAT_CTRL */
>>>> #define PCIE_CAP_BASE 0x70
>>>>
>>>> +/* PCIE controller device IDs */
>>>> +#define PCIE_RC_K2HK 0xb008
>>>> +#define PCIE_RC_K2E 0xb009
>>>> +#define PCIE_RC_K2L 0xb00a
>>>
>>>
>>> A Root Complex doesn't appear in config space as a PCI device, so I think
>>> these are actually Root Port devices, aren't they?
>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>
>>> I suppose the spec would allow Root Complex Integrated Endpoints, on which
>>> MRRS could also be set, but I think your quirk ignores them because they
>>> would appear on the root bus. Is ignoring them OK, or would you want to
>>> set MRRS for those as well?
>>
>>
>> How does the Root Complex integrated endpoints are designed? Our PCI can act
>> as a RC or EP and not both at the same time. So I guess this is not
>> applicable.
>
> My guess is that you probably don't have any integrated endpoints and
> hence don't need to worry about MRRS for them. The PCIe spec (r3.0,
> sec 1.3.2.3) says "A Root Complex Integrated Endpoint is implemented
> on internal logic of Root Complexes that contains [sic] the Root
> Ports."
>
> For example, my laptop has:
>
> 00:03.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT HD Audio Controller
> 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Lynx Point-LP PCI Express Root Port 1
> 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Lynx Point-LP PCI Express Root Port 4
>
> the 00:03.0 Audio device is a PCIe device but it is a sibling of the
> Root Ports rather than being downstream from them, i.e., it's an
> Integrated Endpoint that is part of the Root Complex itself.
Ok. Got it. This is not applicable for Keystone PCI RC.
Regards,
Murali
>
>>>> +
>>>> #define to_keystone_pcie(x) container_of(x, struct keystone_pcie, pp)
>>>>
>>>> +static void quirk_limit_mrrs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus;
>>>> + struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* look for the host bridge */
>>>> + while (!pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
>>>> + bridge = bus->self;
>>>> + bus = bus->parent;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (bridge) {
>>>> + u16 id;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Keystone PCI controller has a h/w limitation of
>>>> + * 256 bytes maximum read request size. It can't handle
>>>> + * anything higher than this. So force this limit on
>>>> + * all downstream devices
>>>> + */
>>>> + pci_read_config_word(bridge, PCI_DEVICE_ID,&id);
>>>
>>>
>>> I think you should check the Vendor ID here as well. Otherwise, there's a
>>> possibility of applying this quirk to devices under a bridge with the same
>>> Device ID but different Vendor ID.
>>>
>>> And I think you should be able to use the bridge->vendor and
>>> bridge->device
>>> fields instead of reading them from config space. Actually, this might be
>>> a good place to use pci_match_id().
>>
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> + if ((id == PCIE_RC_K2HK) || (id == PCIE_RC_K2E) ||
>>>> + (id == PCIE_RC_K2L)) {
>>>> + if (pcie_get_readrq(dev)> 256) {
>>>> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "limiting mrrs to
>>>> 256\n");
>>>> + pcie_set_readrq(dev, 256);
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_limit_mrrs);
>>>> +
>>>> static int ks_pcie_establish_link(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pcie_port *pp =&ks_pcie->pp;
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists