linux-kernel - Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] x86: add coreboot framebuffer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP6exY+ehqwpt0tC_Xa=ZP4jbjnzWii+=qc-=rqxC5rK5mG3Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:55:56 -0700
From:	ron minnich <rminnich@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <x86@...nel.org>,
	coreboot <coreboot@...eboot.org>
Subject: Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] x86: add coreboot framebuffer support

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> I'm not a fan of Coreboot having invented its own nonstandard hacks, but
> I guess it is pretty much unavoidable.

I suspect this should not be architecture-dependent, since coreboot
tables work across 3 coreboot architectures at present with more on
the way.

Sometimes, something that spans more than an x86 can look like a
non-standard hack. At other times, it might look portable. Depends on
ones perspective I guess.

Gerd, I'll get back to you offline to show you what we did in Akaros.

ron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/