[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140905224509.GF18411@ld-irv-0074>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:45:09 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10.y+] PM / sleep: Use valid_state() for
platform-dependent sleep states only
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:36:26PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > If they apply cleanly, then just list the git commit ids, and I can take
> > > care of the rest.
> >
> > OK. Is this a policy that should be documented? AIUI, we have a few
> > options:
> >
> > 1. Include 'Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org' in the original commit that
> > gets to Linus
> >
> > 2. Send an email to stable@...r.kernel.org that just contains the
> > commit IDs, after they've made it to Linus
> >
> > 3. Send patches to stable@...r.kernel.org, if backporting is not
> > trivial
> >
> > #1 is most common, and #2 seems like it would handle most of what misses
> > #1. #3 seems inferior, whenever #2 would suffice. But #2 is not in
> > stable_kernel_rules.txt.
>
> I always gladly take patches to that .txt file if you wish to make it
> clearer.
I was interested in whether I had my facts straight before trying to
document them. I'll take your response to mean I'm not far off base, so
I'll take a stab at patching the file.
Thanks,
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists