[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxyjLKCr6xpYWtXW34_Z3v1_V2WB1vD583mAcPtGijn9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:28:27 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatjain@...iper.net>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...iper.net>,
Richard Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Josh Logan <joshtlogan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci/probe: Enable CRS for Intel Haswell root ports
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> But as you point out, we don't see the "not responding" message. We
> only print that if we read 0xffff0001 (device/vendor ID). But lspci
> claims the vendor:device ID is 0001:8168. So my new theory is:
[snip]
Sounds like a very reasonable theory and quite possible. And if Josh
actually still has the hardware, it would be lovely to hear the
results. Josh?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists