linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140905193354.4a123a4c@as>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 19:33:54 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
To:	Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@...n.ch>
Cc:	Peter Kieser <peter@...ser.ca>, "eddie@...k.net" <eddie@...k.net>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>,
	"Kent Overstreet" <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +0000
Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@...n.ch> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser <peter@...ser.ca>
>  wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3,
> >>> going all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's
> >>> anyone that cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually
> >>> use it), now would be a good time to pipe up.
> >> 
> >> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in
> >> production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and
> >> backport these though :-)
> >> 
> >> Eddie
> > 
> > I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production.
> > 
> > -Peter
> > 
> 
> 
> More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in
> production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider
> scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd
> certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel.
> 

CentOS does not ship bcache at all. In retrospect it's obvious why.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/