linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efi: Resolve some shadow warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1409994948.2460.48.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date:	Sat, 06 Sep 2014 02:15:48 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	matt.fleming@...el.com, Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Resolve some shadow warnings

On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 10:03 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Sep, at 06:34:52PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
> > 
> > It is a really bad idea to declare variables or parameters that
> > have the same name as common types. It is valid C, but it gets
> > surprising if a macro expansion attempts to declare an inner
> > local with that type. Change the local names to eliminate the
> > hazard.
>  
> Oops, good catch. Could you include a copy of the compiler shadow
> warnings in the commit log? I'm guessing this bug is highlighted with
> -Wshadow? How did you discover this problem?

Mark was using W=2 to see the warning, so I will see if I can wade
through the numerous warnings that get generated with W=2 for the
specific warning.

> 
> > Change s16 => ps16, s8 => ps8.
>  
> Hmm... Instead, could you change it to str16 and str8? s8/s16 were
> clearly misguided names in the first place, and it's not immediatealy
> obvious to me that a 'ps16' would represent "pointer to 16-bit string".
> 

Ok, I can re-spin the patch for Mark, that is if I can capture the
original warning to add to his commit message.  Otherwise, I will wait
till Monday to have Mark re-spin the patch.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)