linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64, thunder: Add Kconfig option for Cavium Thunder SoC Family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8282633.qB60Cj5UPD@wuerfel>
Date:	Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:29:10 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64, thunder: Add Kconfig option for Cavium Thunder SoC Family

On Monday 08 September 2014 13:01:31 Robert Richter wrote:
> This is well hidden on x86, but each vendor has a config option. For
> AMD systems we have had our own option to disable vendor specific
> code, see CPU_SUP_AMD for example. Disabling this will remove all AMD
> specific code in the kernel. Of course this is enabled per default.
> 
> With ARCH_THUNDER I intended to do the same (you could name this also
> SOC_SUP_CAVIUM or so but I kept the current naming scheme). In patch
> 4/4 I have added the option to defconfig. This enables this per
> default and nobody has to deal with any option manually, just running
> make defconfig is fine.
> 
> Also, at least to disable building the dtb file for foo, you will need
> ARCH_FOO too. How else would you deal with dtb files then?

The only alternative I see is to build them all.

> Having ARCH_FOO might not be necessary for drivers. One could enable
> drivers manually, but this option is still a good reference for the
> drivers needed by foo. At some point you will carry tons of enabled
> drivers in your defconfig and you don't know which platform actually
> is using it. For generic drivers this might be fine.  But in my point
> of few, each soc specific driver should have an soc specific option
> too. Then you easily can remove an soc from the defconfig.

Yes, that's what I had in my example.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/