[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540DA42D.3080208@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:42:21 +0100
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
CC: emil.l.velikov@...il.com, dmarlin@...hat.com,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Brian Paul <brianp@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix drm.h include
On 08/09/14 13:15, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> To the VMware guys,
>>
>> Any objections if we update the libdrm header and drop the mesa/ddx copies ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emil
> Hi!
>
> vmwgfx libdrm is pretty obsolete and AFAIK not used by anyone.
> As such, it's unnecessary to release a new version of libdrm each time
> the vmwgfx header is updated, and I'd like to avoid that dependency.
> Better to keep the local copies in the gallium winsys and the DDX. Since
> the ioctl interface is backwards compatible, it doesn't really matter if
> the headers are slightly out of sync.
>
Afaict libdrm releases are dirt cheap, and should not cause any issues. Yet
it's your code so you'll be the judge of it all.
I'm just a de-duplication fanatic :)
-Emil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists