[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409080914370.20388@gentwo.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:15:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > - return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base);
> > + return raw_cpu_read(*base->percpu_base);
>
> Isn't the pointer dereference supposed to be performed _outside_ the per
> CPU accessor?
It looks like percpu_base is a regular pointer to an offset. This is the
correct way to refer to get the offset and load the value that the offset
points to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists