lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409080914370.20388@gentwo.org>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:15:40 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> > -	return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base);
> > +	return raw_cpu_read(*base->percpu_base);
>
> Isn't the pointer dereference supposed to be performed _outside_ the per
> CPU accessor?

It looks like percpu_base is a regular pointer to an offset. This is the
correct way to refer to get the offset and load the value that the offset
points to.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ