[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1409081041160.29432@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:46:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>, kkolasa@...soft.pl,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: implement kmalloc guard
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> > This patch adds a new option DEBUG_KMALLOC that makes it possible to
> > detect writes beyond the end of space allocated with kmalloc. Normally,
> > the kmalloc function rounds the size to the next power of two (there is
> > exception to this rule - sizes 96 and 192). Slab debugging detects only
> > writes beyond the end of the slab object, it is unable to detect writes
> > beyond the end of kmallocated size that fit into the slab object.
> >
> > The motivation for this patch was this: There was 6 year old bug in
> > dm-crypt (d49ec52ff6ddcda178fc2476a109cf1bd1fa19ed) where the driver would
> > write beyond the end of kmallocated space, but the bug went undetected
> > because the write would fit into the power-of-two-sized slab object. Only
> > recent changes to dm-crypt made the bug show up. There is similar problem
> > in the nx-crypto driver in the function nx_crypto_ctx_init - again,
> > because kmalloc rounds the size up to the next power of two, this bug went
> > undetected.
>
> The problem with the kmalloc array for debugging is inded that it is
> only for powers of two for efficiency purposes. In the debug
> situation we may not have the need for that efficiency. Maybe simply
> creating kmalloc arrays for each size will do the trick?
I don't know what you mean. If someone allocates 10000 objects with sizes
from 1 to 10000, you can't have 10000 slab caches - you can't have a slab
cache for each used size. Also - you can't create a slab cache in
interrupt context.
> > This patch works for slab, slub and slob subsystems. The end of slab block
> > can be found out with ksize (this patch renames it to __ksize). At the end
> > of the block, we put a structure kmalloc_guard. This structure contains a
> > magic number and a real size of the block - the exact size given to
>
> We already have a redzone structure to check for writes over the end of
> the object. Lets use that.
So, change all three slab subsystems to use that.
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists