[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540DCB35.7080405@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:28:53 -0500
From: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix kvmclock breakage from timers branch merge
On 09/05/2014 04:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/09/2014 22:41, Thomas Gleixner ha scritto:
>> No, it needs to be above update_vsyscall(). Here is the patch again
>> which I sent before. [https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/5/395]
>
> Ah, I missed it after your signature. Thanks, I'll test yours then next
> week.
>
> Paolo
>
Paolo, Thomas,
Thanks again. I can confirm that Thomas' "timekeeping: Update timekeeper
before updating vsyscall and pvclock" indeed allows the kvmclock test to
pass on my machine.
--chris j arges
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists