[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540E1587.3060108@tilera.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:45:59 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC: <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Miroslav Franc <mfranc@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bit fields && data tearing
On 9/8/2014 1:50 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> Actual alignment is pretty irrelevant. That's why all architectures
> which require alignment also have to implement misaligned traps ... this
> is a fundamental requirement of the networking code, for instance.
Can you clarify what you think the requirement is? The tile architecture
doesn't support misaligned load/store in general, but we do support it for
userspace (using a nifty JIT approach with a direct-map hash table kept
in userspace), and also for get_user/put_user. But that's it, and,
the networking subsystem works fine for us.
Occasionally we report bugs for driver code that doesn't use the
get_unaligned_xxx() macros and friends, and our fixes are generally taken
upstream.
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists