lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140908215723.GA21556@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:57:23 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
Cc:	Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: remove disp attribute show function

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:44:38PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:23:06PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:16:27PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:12:42PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR(camera, 0644, CM_ASL_CAMERA);
> > > >  EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR(cardr, 0644, CM_ASL_CARDREADER);
> > > > -EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR(disp, 0200, CM_ASL_DISPLAYSWITCH);
> > > > +
> > > > +static ssize_t store_disp(struct device *dev,
> > > > +			  struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > +			  const char *buf, size_t count)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return store_sys_acpi(dev, CM_ASL_DISPLAYSWITCH, buf, count);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct device_attribute dev_attr_disp = {
> > > > +	.attr = {
> > > > +		.name = "disp",
> > > > +		.mode = 0200 },
> > > > +	.store  = store_disp,
> > > > +};
> > > 
> > > DEVICE_ATTR()?
> > 
> > That would make sense, wouldn't it? The only defense I have is that it
> > isn't used in EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR() either.
> 
> I might as well fix that as well, and the fact that the octal
> permissions are used instead of S_IRUGO and friends. Would you prefer
> that in a separate patch?

I'm not taking these patches, so I can't answer that...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ