[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140908225308.GA13885@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:53:08 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Sergey Klyaus <Sergey.Klyaus@...e-IT.Ru>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: fix race with userland in device_add()
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:18:38PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Sergey Klyaus wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I wrote a patch that fixes the problem that described above, here are a
> > patch for 3.16.0+ kernel (cloned from GitHub today). Maybe that "if
> > (MAJOR(dev->devt)) " part has to go even after BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE abd
> > KOBJ_ADD? I put it before it, because there is no rollback code in
> > device_add() for that part.
>
> I think this is fine. However, I suspect the order of the other calls
> there isn't totally right. For instance, the
>
> if (parent)
> klist_add_tail(&dev->p->knode_parent,
> &parent->p->klist_children);
>
> part should probably be the first thing after we know the routine can't
> abort.
>
> I guess the time when bus_probe_device() gets called doesn't matter
> much, because the driver might not even be loaded at this point. But
> what about all the dev->class stuff at the end of device_add()? Should
> that happen before any uevents are sent out?
>
> Greg, have you looked at this?
I haven't, given that it's not in a format that I could apply it in,
even if I wanted to :(
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists